“天才法案”|加密币预测模型|GENIUS Act and Crypto Prediction Models

zychen Posted on 2025-07-19 13:00 ET total Views: 1688

最近美国通过的“天才法案”(GENIUS Act,全称 Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act)已由国会在2025年6月17日(参议院68比30通过)和7月17日(众议院308比122通过)通过,并于7月18日由特朗普总统签署成为法律


📜 法案要点

📈 对投资市场的影响

稳定币市场增长潜力

加密资产整体回暖

金融市场与国债需求

风险与争议

✅ 总结

影响方向 评估

市场扩容 法案提供明确监管路径助推稳定币发行规模扩张与机构参与,加密市场信心受提振。

美元与美债 稳定币 1:1 挂钩引发对美元与美债需求上升,有助于加强美元国际地位。

投资多样化 401(k) 等传统投资渠道逐步纳入加密资产可能性增强。

监管争议 风险监管仍有缺口,需关注后续监管细则落实及执行力度。


综上,天才法案标志着美国加密监管实现重大突破,为投资者和机构带来明确游戏规则,短期推升加密市场热度、增强主流资本信心,长期则有望推动稳定币及数字资产的广泛应用。但同时需警惕执行滞后、利益冲突、消费者保护等潜在风险。


随着加密币成为主流投资资产,QTR正式发布运行多年的加密币预测模型。


ETH-USD日线模型:


ETH-USD最近近乎翻翻,是新的起点还是见好就收呢?


BTC-USD日线模型:


Recently, the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act) was passed by the U.S. Congress – approved by the Senate on June 17, 2025 (68-30 vote), the House on July 17 (308-122 vote), and signed into law by President Trump on July 18.


📜 Key Provisions of the Act

📈 Impact on Investment Markets

Stablecoin Market Expansion Potential

Crypto Asset Market Rebound

Demand for U.S. Treasuries and Dollar Strengthening

Risks and Controversies

✅ Summary

Impact Assessment

Market Expansion Provides regulatory clarity, boosting stablecoin issuance scale and institutional participation, lifting crypto market confidence.

Dollar & Treasuries Stablecoin 1:1 peg drives USD and Treasury demand, strengthening U.S. monetary dominance.

Investment Diversification Enhances prospects for crypto inclusion in traditional investment vehicles like 401(k)s.

Regulatory Controversies Execution gaps and potential conflicts of interest remain concerns for future oversight effectiveness.


In summary, the GENIUS Act marks a historic breakthrough for U.S. crypto regulation, creating clear rules for investors and institutions. In the short term, it has driven market rallies and boosted confidence, while in the long term, it is expected to promote widespread stablecoin and digital asset adoption. However, attention must remain on its implementation details, consumer protection sufficiency, and political-economic risks.


Back to Posts